On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 12:15 +0100, Richard Atterer wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 01:07:56AM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: > > However, the original BDF version can contain ASCII comments that are > > not preserved in the PCF version. These comments often contain > > information such as author, copyright, and licensing information. > > With the BDF versions discarded, that information is lost -- there is > > no round-trip conversion from BDF to PCF to BDF. > > My first thought: Could BDF be considered a source format for PCF? The > logical consequence would be to ship BDF in the source package, and to > convert it to PCF when the font package is built.
That's pretty much what happens today, afaik. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
