On Sun, Jul 06, 2008, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2008-07-06, Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > fd.o menus are designed to allow distro-specific policy. It's the matter > > of Debian KDE/Gnome packaging/menu policy to get the proper subset of > > the packages in menu (e.g. moving Gnome/gtk applications deeper in KDE > > menu and Qt/KDE - in Gnome one). > > I actually don't like this - just as I don't like the "kde" and "gnome" > package sections. > > The users should have equal access to good programs.
Are you commenting on OnlyShowIn? This feature is not meant to list all GNOME-ish apps in GNOME and KDE-ish apps in KDE. It's meant to prevent some silly things to display across desktops. For instance "gnome-about" (About GNOME) shouldn't show in the KDE menus, nor should the configuration applets for window management, keyboard etc. which touch GNOME specific GConf settings, or nautilus-cd-burner... There are "only" 47 desktop files with OnlyShowIn on my system out of 218 desktop files installed, so it's not used too wildly I would say. (Some of these are probably bogus.) > Most people (no matter what desktop they are using) thinks that > - amarok is better than the gnome equivalent (rythmbox?) there isn't "one" GNOME player; I don't know whether amarok is OnlyShowIn KDE, but Rhythmbox should show up in KDE menus, just like Banshee and I hope the other players as well (Quodlibet, etc.). > - gimp is better than the kde equivalent (released versions of krita) > - kontact and evolution - fits different to different people These don't have an OnlyShowIn here and should show up in KDE menus. -- Loïc Minier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
