sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 03:07 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> What's the importance of Debian Policy if RM team can do whatever they >> want? How we can ensure that Debian has the minimal quality when it's >> get release? > > the change would make it reflect the fact that this is already the > reality--that yes packages that do not comply with policy are allowed in > a stable release etc. we then put a certain level of trust in the RM's > that they won't abuse this (we are already doing this too).
Doing that we just lose the meaning of have something like Debian Policy. Why RM team wouldn't use it to meet the deadline and reducing the overall quality of release? Take http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2006/10/msg00177.html as example. I fail to see why it's not a RC bug. -- O T A V I O S A L V A D O R --------------------------------------------- E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio --------------------------------------------- "Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
