On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 11:01:13AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:59:24AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > 3.1) Provide an easy and reliable way to tell if the optional targets
> > are implemented.
>
> And once that's there, clarify Policy to say what dpkg-buildpackage et al
> will do: if optional targets are missing, do the old thing. If the optional
> targets are there, do the new thing instead.
Oh, I just misparsed this when I replied last time. I think what you
mean is:
if rules.version=0, then dpkg-buildpackage behaviour will be ...
if rules.version=1, then dpkg-buildpackage will be allowed to do ...
etc.
But of course, this has to be done with the consent and coorperation
of the dpkg maintainers.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, website: http://www.polya.uklinux.net/
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see: http://people.debian.org/~jdg/
Visit http://www.thehungersite.com/ to help feed the hungry
