On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 07:07:18PM +0200, Martin Godisch wrote: > > > This proposal aims to synchronize the Debian Policy, section 9.3, with > > > the LSB 1.3.0, chapter 24 [1]. Attached is a patch and the resulting > > > plain text for better reading.
> > Objection. Why should our init scripts comply with the LSB? > Because it's a good thing to comply with the LSB when possible? Because > it's considered a bug [1] not to do so? I think you've misunderstood the intent of that requirement. The requirement is that sarge be an LSB-compliant *host system*; the portion of the LSB you're citing refers to how LSB packages *themselves* must behave, it is not behavior that LSB packages must be able to depend on from the underlying system. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
pgpckYnzfaekW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
