On Apr 28, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it is premature to tatify into policy an action that > has not been fully decided upon, and has not yet had all the kinks > ironed out yet. > > While I understand the use cases presented for /run; I am not > yet convinced that the solutions are mature. We shoulkd first have a > working solution, and present a proposal based on the working set to > policy at that time. I fully agree. I remember providing an alternative solution for all or most of the problems which /run should solve, so I'm firmly opposed to create this new, unneeded directory, which is nothing more than a gratuitous change from other linux systems.
-- ciao, | Marco | [685 pojGka.AXOG6I]
