On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 10:53:00PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:

> My personal opinion (subject to change with good arguments against it,
> of course) is that clean must not require root unless another target has
> been invoked as root.

The argument against this is that the majority of package currently
DO require root (or fakeroot, dh_testroot can't tell the difference).
Nor does policy *FORBID* this -- it may not MANDATE it, but it doesn't
forbid it, and we don't change policy to make a majority (or even a
large number) of packages magically become buggy.

-- 
Chris Waters           |  Pneumonoultra-        osis is too long
[EMAIL PROTECTED]       |  microscopicsilico-    to fit into a single
or [EMAIL PROTECTED] |  volcaniconi-          standalone haiku

Reply via email to