On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 10:53:00PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > My personal opinion (subject to change with good arguments against it, > of course) is that clean must not require root unless another target has > been invoked as root.
The argument against this is that the majority of package currently DO require root (or fakeroot, dh_testroot can't tell the difference). Nor does policy *FORBID* this -- it may not MANDATE it, but it doesn't forbid it, and we don't change policy to make a majority (or even a large number) of packages magically become buggy. -- Chris Waters | Pneumonoultra- osis is too long [EMAIL PROTECTED] | microscopicsilico- to fit into a single or [EMAIL PROTECTED] | volcaniconi- standalone haiku