On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 03:27:43AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 02:01:29AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > > > Packages that would deserve a bug are those that which have additional > > > docs > > > but have registered it only with dhelp or such (ew!) or that have it but > > > haven't registered it. > > > > It would be cool if somebody could figure out how to fix #114692 first. > > :( Packages with many distinct pieces of additional documentation can't > > practicably use doc-base otherwise. I don't know if it might require > > significant design work ... > > I think you should just go ahead and implement what you said in the bug > report, and upload it. I don't think Adam will mind :)
I'm more concerned that it will require changing install-docs' interface (depending on how it's done, it could even require changing the format of doc-base control files), and that will be much more difficult if it's frozen by being documented in policy. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
