On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:56:51AM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 07:39:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > b) what severity such bugs should be > > > > I strongly disagree with this. I wrote up an extensive explanation of > > why recently: > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2002/debian-ctte-200211/msg00027.html > > Hmm, wretched limited debbugs semantics. How about ranges? > {RC, (serious/important/normal/minor), wishlist} or similar. That still > covers all the cases, I think.
As you may be able to deduce from the message I cited, I am uncomfortable with the Policy manual mandating bug severities in any way. I think such things are better left to the documentation of the BTS itself. -- G. Branden Robinson | If God had intended for man to go Debian GNU/Linux | about naked, we would have been [EMAIL PROTECTED] | born that way. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgpaAChDt4AFt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
