On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Santiago Vila wrote:

> retitle 69311 [PROPOSAL] Symlinks in /usr/doc not mandatory anymore.
> thanks
> 
> [ I naively proposed something like this after the release of potato,
>   but it was not the right time... ].
> 
> Proposed patch to current policy:
> 
> diff -r -u debian-policy-3.5.6.1.orig/policy.sgml 
> debian-policy-3.5.6.1/policy.sgml
> --- debian-policy-3.5.6.1.orig/policy.sgml    Thu Mar 14 19:17:48 2002
> +++ debian-policy-3.5.6.1/policy.sgml Mon Jul 22 11:19:58 2002
> @@ -7383,48 +7383,6 @@
> 
>        </sect>
> 
> -      <sect id="usrdoc">
> -     <heading>Accessing the documentation</heading>
> -
> -     <p>
> -       Former Debian releases placed all additional documentation
> -       in <tt>/usr/doc/<var>package</var></tt>.  To realize a
> -       smooth migration to
> -       <tt>/usr/share/doc/<var>package</var></tt>, each package
> -       must maintain a symlink <tt>/usr/doc/<var>package</var></tt>
> -       that points to the new location of its documentation in
> -       <tt>/usr/share/doc/<var>package</var></tt><footnote>These
> -           symlinks will be removed in the future, but they have to be
> -           there for compatibility reasons until all packages have
> -           moved and the policy is changed accordingly.</footnote>.
> -       The symlink must be created when the package is installed;
> -       it cannot be contained in the package itself due to problems
> -       with <prgn>dpkg</prgn>. One reasonable way to accomplish
> -       this is to put the following in the package's
> -       <prgn>postinst</prgn><footnote>
> -         <p>
> -           The <tt>debhelper</tt> script
> -           <prgn>dh_installdocs</prgn> does this automatically.
> -         </p>
> -       </footnote>:
> -          <example compact="compact">
> -if [ "$1" = "configure" ]; then
> -  if [ -d /usr/doc -a ! -e /usr/doc/<var>package</var> \
> -       -a -d /usr/share/doc/<var>package</var> ]; then
> -    ln -sf ../share/doc/<var>package</var> /usr/doc/<var>package</var>
> -  fi
> -fi
> -          </example>
> -          and the following in the package's <prgn>prerm</prgn>:
> -          <example compact="compact">
> -if [ \( "$1" = "upgrade" -o "$1" = "remove" \) \
> -     -a -L /usr/doc/<var>package</var> ]; then
> -  rm -f /usr/doc/<var>package</var>
> -fi
> -          </example>
> -     </p>
> -      </sect>
> -
>        <sect>
>       <heading>Preferred documentation formats</heading>
> 
> 
> This way, by removing the requirement that packages must maintain
> symlinks in /usr/doc, we are in fact allowing new packages not to
> fiddle with symlinks anymore.
> 
> I'm looking for seconds for this proposal, which is *just* to stop
> requiring symlinks.

seconded
                                        yours,
                                        peter

-- 
 PGP signed and encrypted  |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
    messages preferred.    | : :' :      The  universal
                           | `. `'      Operating System
 http://www.palfrader.org/ |   `-    http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: pgpoTJ7fe7tzQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to