On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 04:28:56PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote: > >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andrew> To clarify, I'm talking about Java code compiled (eg, by > Andrew> gcj) into architecture-specific machine code. These > Andrew> libraries are still meant to be used by Java code (also > Andrew> compiled with gcj), not C code. So I think java should > Andrew> still be part of the name. > > That statement is true iff you can use the gjc produced .so files with > kaffa/jdk/etc without *any* additional coding/configuratiojn/whatever. > I don't think that condition is satisfiable right now.
No it's not. But you can use the gcj produced .so files with gcj. If I do all my Java development with gcj, Debian packages containing Java libraries compiled to .so's are very useful to me. Andrew PS. s/gjc/gcj/g ;-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
