>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
    Andrew> To clarify, I'm talking about Java code compiled (eg, by
    Andrew> gcj) into architecture-specific machine code.  These
    Andrew> libraries are still meant to be used by Java code (also
    Andrew> compiled with gcj), not C code.  So I think java should
    Andrew> still be part of the name.

That statement is true iff you can use the gjc produced .so files with
kaffa/jdk/etc without *any* additional coding/configuratiojn/whatever.
I don't think that condition is satisfiable right now.

.java => gjc => executable/shared object is a one-way function.

-- 
Stephen

"A duck!"


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to