>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andrew> To clarify, I'm talking about Java code compiled (eg, by Andrew> gcj) into architecture-specific machine code. These Andrew> libraries are still meant to be used by Java code (also Andrew> compiled with gcj), not C code. So I think java should Andrew> still be part of the name.
That statement is true iff you can use the gjc produced .so files with kaffa/jdk/etc without *any* additional coding/configuratiojn/whatever. I don't think that condition is satisfiable right now. .java => gjc => executable/shared object is a one-way function. -- Stephen "A duck!" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]