Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2001 21:36:50 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line No longer relevant
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 1999 00:35:06 +0000
Received: (qmail 12460 invoked from network); 29 Nov 1999 00:35:05 -0000
Received: from janeway.cistron.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 29 Nov 1999 00:35:05 -0000
Received: from lightning.mors.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [195.64.66.141])
        by janeway.cistron.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id BAA10781
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 01:35:03 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by lightning.mors.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id AAA24247
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 00:44:17 +0100
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 00:44:16 +0100
From: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: packaging manual shouldn't dictate dselect behaviour
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ghzN8eJ9Qlbqn3iT"
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre4i


--ghzN8eJ9Qlbqn3iT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: packaging-manual

The current packaging-manual dictates how dselect reacts to relations
from packages. If you look at section 8.2 there are statements
such as:

     `Recommends'
          [...]
          It is treated by `dselect' exactly as `Depends' is; this makes it
          hard for the user to select things so as to leave `Recommends'
          fields unsatisfied, but they are able to do so by being
          persistent.

Similar statements are made for other relations.

I don't think the packaging-manual should dictate how dselect handles
relations. The current CVS version of dselect already changed its
behaviour somewhat making some of these statements false.

Wichert.

--=20
   ________________________________________________________________
 / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience  \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]                    http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

--ghzN8eJ9Qlbqn3iT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjhBvlAACgkQPLiSUC+jvC076wCgqW6c+seRAZ8IqY8LpMyyFu/c
B+AAoJj4gu3Rrz0Knj5YjDydjbrsxQBA
=U4IH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ghzN8eJ9Qlbqn3iT--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 51472-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jun 2001 21:32:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 10 16:32:08 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mserv1e.vianw.co.uk [::ffff:195.102.240.97] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 159Coa-0005SU-00; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 16:32:08 -0500
Received: from [195.102.197.228] (helo=polya)
        by mserv1e.vianw.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #5)
        id 159CoX-00008m-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 22:32:05 +0100
Received: from jdg by polya with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
        id 159Bx4-0002kH-00; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 21:36:50 +0100
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 21:36:50 +0100
From: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: No longer relevant
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
Sender: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The section dealing with package relations in policy no longer
contains the offending paragraph about how dselect handles Recommends
et al, so this bug can be closed.

   Julian

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

         Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
       Debian GNU/Linux Developer,  see http://people.debian.org/~jdg
  Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/

Reply via email to