Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2001 22:16:47 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Packaging manual now incorporated into policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 1999 17:53:54 +0000
Received: (qmail 26529 invoked from network); 9 Jan 1999 17:53:50 -0000
Received: from tiamat.golden-gryphon.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 9 Jan 1999 17:53:50 -0000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by tiamat.golden-gryphon.com (8.9.2/8.9.1/Debian/GNU) id LAA17307;
        Sat, 9 Jan 1999 11:53:05 -0600 (EST)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Time: Sat Jan  9 11:53:03 1999
Mail-Copies-To: never
Organization: Manoj Srivastava's Home
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PROPOSED] Explicitly making the Packaging Manual a Policy Document
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 09 Jan 1999 11:53:04 -0600
In-Reply-To: Robert Woodcock's message of "9 Jan 1999 16:50:47 -0000"
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 47
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070069 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.69) Emacs/20.3

Package: packaging-manual
Version:2.5.0.0
Severity: wishlist


Hi,
 [Robert Woodcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> points out that the Packaging
  manual states that it is not policy]

        In that case, I think I do owe Wichert an aopology. I think I
 would like to change those paragraphs to the following:
______________________________________________________________________
 This manual describes the technical aspects of creating Debian binary
 and source packages. It also documents the interface between `dselect'
 and its access method scripts. It does not deal with the Debian
- Project policy requirements, and it assumes familiarity with `dpkg''s
- functions from the system administrator's perspective.
+ Projects non-technical policy requirements, which are covered in a
+ related document, and it assumes familiarity with `dpkg''s functions
+ from the system administrator's perspective. As far as the technical
+ aspects go, this document has the weight of Debian Policy.

[snip]


- It does _not_ describe the policy requirements imposed on Debian
+ It does _not_ describe _all_ the policy requirements imposed on Debian
 packages, such as the permissions on files and directories,
 documentation requirements, upload procedure, and so on. You should
- see the Debian packaging policy manual for these details. (Many of
+ see the Debian Policy Manual for these details. (Many of
 them will probably turn out to be helpful even if you don't plan to
 upload your package and make it available as part of the
 distribution.)
______________________________________________________________________


        A corresponding change should also be made to the policy
 manual, and I shall propose that after this motion either stands or
 falls. 

        manoj
-- 
 Never speak ill of yourself, your friends will always say enough on
 that subject. Charles-Maurice De Talleyrand
Manoj Srivastava     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>    <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 31645-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jun 2001 21:32:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 10 16:32:08 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mserv1e.vianw.co.uk [::ffff:195.102.240.97] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 159Coa-0005Rn-00; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 16:32:08 -0500
Received: from [195.102.197.228] (helo=polya)
        by mserv1e.vianw.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #5)
        id 159CoT-00008b-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 22:32:02 +0100
Received: from jdg by polya with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
        id 159CZj-0002pZ-00; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 22:16:47 +0100
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 22:16:47 +0100
From: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Packaging manual now incorporated into policy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
Sender: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Well, the packaging manual is now incorporated into the policy manual,
so this proposal is basically done.

   Julian

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

         Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
       Debian GNU/Linux Developer,  see http://people.debian.org/~jdg
  Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/

Reply via email to