On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 09:34:01PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 11:30:08AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > > --- policy.sgml.old Sun Mar 25 22:33:31 2001 > > > +++ policy.sgml Sun Mar 25 22:33:52 2001 > > > @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ > > > </p> > > > <p> > > > These classifications are roughly equivalent to the bug > ^^^^^^^ > > > - severities <em>important</em> (for <em>must</em> or > > > + severities <em>serious</em> (for <em>must</em> or > > > <em>required</em> directive violations), <em>normal</em> > > > (for <em>should</em> or <em>recommended</em> directive > > > violations) and <em>wishlist</em> (for <em>optional</em> > > What about important severity? I would suggest the following: > > *shrug* Does it matter? I'm not worried either way.
Not much, but if we're changing it already, we may as well get it roughly right. Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://people.debian.org/~jdg Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/