Previously Julian Gilbey wrote: > Agreed. I presume that ldconfig exists on all systems, though.
All systems Debian currently runs on anyway. I kind of expect that to change at some point though. > Please explain; I don't know what you mean here. I'll have to get back to you on that :) > Are we going to follow the LSB for runlevels? Is there anything else > we should be following it for? This should definitely be a separate > proposal. I certainly hope we are going to follow it: Debian is in an excellent position to be a demonstration LSB complient system, and I would hate to miss that opportunity. LSB isn't finished yet though, and I expect more changes to changes to be needed at some point. People interesting in policy should definitely try to keep up with LSB as well > But it makes no sense to force-reload or stop or restart checkfs.sh. > What about /etc/rcS.d/S40networking? Or /etc/rc[2-5].d/S99rmnologin? > These two cases show that it's pretty close, but not quite all the way > there. networking should move out of rcS.d, since LSB specifies runlevels without networking which is impossible of networking is in /etc/rcS.d . > But should force-reload be a "must"? I would say so. Wichert. -- ________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
