Hi,
>>"Wichert" == Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Wichert> But Manoj said he would remove the non-policy bits from it, and this
Wichert> would clearly fall in that category imho.
I disagree.
Wichert> I'll make this a proposal then:
Wichert> As such I propose that the statement that debian/rules has be to a
Wichert> makefile be removed.
I think I must object to this, on the grounds that we are now
changing an published interface to the package building process.
Indeed, I have used makefiles that include ./debian/rules and derive
targets and tweak the make rules in the debian/rules process
(security related experiments), and I would strongly object to the
mechanisms being yanked out from under me.
manoj
--
"A mind is a terrible thing to have leaking out your ears." The
League of Sadistic Telepaths
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
