On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 11:14:58AM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote: > So we say "Packages MUST specify source dependencies." and in the > annex to policy: "Failure to specify source dependencies is currently > not RC."
If the MUST specify source dependencies, it's RC by definition. That was the whole point of the MUST/SHOULD/MAY split. If you want something else: either per-package exceptions, or some way of documenting how policy is planned to look in the future (at least, when there is such a plan), I've already suggested ways of dealing with this: README.Debian and BLOCKED/ONHOLD. But MUST already serves a purpose as is, please don't mess with it. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
pgpxGW1VB9MRT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
