* Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010220 13:52]: > On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > So, perhaps we should drop the bar a little. If your package is not at > > least > > 3.x.x, it gets held.
> And just out of curiosity: apt has standards version 2.4.1 That is interesting. Of course, I bet apt 0.4 will be > 3.x.x when it is finally released. > And more serious: If you want to force the upgrade of the standards > version you must file 579 RC bugs on these packages. Logistics aside though, wouldn't it be kind of neat to have all the packages shipped with woody be standards version 3.0 or higher? (Although, maybe sarge is a better idea for this one; sarge ought to have kernel 2.4.x, and between that and having all packages be standards version 3.x, numbering sarge to 3.0 would make a certain amount of cool sense. <shrug>) -- Earthlink: The #1 provider of unsolicited bulk email to the Internet.
