Gordon Sadler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 01:01:48AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: >> Is the intent really to forbid multiple front ends to programs like >> gnutalk from being split into separate packages? > >I'm no expert, but check the vim package collection by Wichert >Akkerman.
Well, the footnote to that paragraph in policy says: "It will enable packages like vim-tty to become legal if they are promoted to standard priority" (now vim-tiny, I suppose). From that I'm assuming that the vim packages aren't actually policy-compliant at the moment. >From that and other packages with similar multiple choices, I >would say if they are small, lump them together if possible. If they >conflict (only one at a time makes sense), then separate them but build >all/most from same source if at all possible. I'll see if I can live with having stuff depend on emacs. :) -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
