>>"Santiago" == Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Santiago> 930 packages when looking for usr/doc and
Santiago> 3565/(3565+930) = 79% of packages already use /usr/share/doc.
Santiago> This is exactly where I think there is a major flaw in the
Santiago> original plan: Waiting for all packages to implement the
Santiago> symlinks *before* declaring them all deprecated
I wish you would ascertain what the plan is before complaining
about it. The plan certainly is not to wait for all packages to
implement the symlinks *before* declaring them all deprecated.
It shall be an RC bug to have dirs in /usr/doc for woody. And
that is when we can expect packages to either be upgraded, or swept
out.
Santiago> There are about 20% of packages still using /usr/doc. If we
Santiago> modify debhelper and debmake now, and stop requiring
Santiago> symlinks, we can expect woody to be fully FHS compliant
Santiago> regarding /usr/share/doc, and only 20% non-compliant
Santiago> regarding still existing symlinks.
Since modifying debhelper did not prevent one in five packages
to convert, I doubt that it would magically make woody fully FHS
compliant either.
Woody shall have a full /usr/share/doc/ when released, while
allowing for partial upgrades from potato all the way, under the
plan. I think this is not the time to start getting impatient, and
saying that 79% completion is as good as done. (one or two percent,
perhaps, but 21% -- I don't think so)
manoj
--
There is nothing stranger in a strange land than the stranger who
comes to visit.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
