Ian Jackson wrote: > I don't want to get into a detailed argument about the way the > technical committee worked last time, but it doesn't seem to me that > the process was broken, or that it took too long, or that it came up > with a significantly wrong answer. > > Are you complaining that it took two or three weeks ?
No, he's presumably complaining that it took 1+ months. (From sometime in late July to the 5th of September.) > policy process takes that long too - for every decision, not just > disputed ones - and in the case in point the policy manual itself had > been broken for ages. You can hardly claim it was urgent. For 2 months, due to the delays in both processes, nobody in Debian knew what to do, and there was mass confusion and disagreement. I think this qualified as urgent. -- see shy jo
