Manoj Srivastava wrote: > if [ -d /usr/doc ]; then > # Well, we still need to handle this, at least for the time being > if [ -d /usr/share/doc/$package_name ]; then > # So the new doc dir exists, goody > if [ -d /usr/doc/$package_name ]; then > echo "Yikes! The old directory, /usr/doc/$package_name" > echo "has not ben removed! This is an error; attemptig" > echo "repairs" > if [ -f /usr/doc/$package_name/.dhelp ]; then > rm -f /usr/doc/$package_name/.dhelp > rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty /usr/doc/$package_name/ > fi > [...]
All this will fail if at some time in the future /usr/doc is a symlink to /usr/share/doc. I have posted a similar script 3 weeks ago (see http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-policy-9909/msg00240.html) which does not have this problem. -- Stefan Gybas
