On Sat, Sep 04, 1999 at 12:25:09PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: <snip> > Other packages for similar reasons are built without dpkg-shlibdeps. I > decided to fix this bug. And now my bugfix is being stonewalled for > political reasons. If those who oppose policy ammendments aren't willing > to stand behind their opposition, they should not be allowed to kill off > those ammendments by simply dropping out of the conversation and saying > nothing more. > > And I have yet to hear a better idea to solve the problem. I have said I > would withdraw my proposal if I heard another reasonable idea. Simply not > using dpkg-shlibdeps isn't IMO reasonable, neither is hacking a binary.
Agreed, can we please just push this through?
Zephaniah E. Hull..
>
> --
> Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux developer
> GnuPG: 2048g/3F9C2A43 - 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
> PGP 2.6: 2048R/50BDA0ED - E8 D6 84 81 E3 A8 BB 77 8E E2 29 96 C9 44 5F BE
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> * dark has changed the topic on channel #debian to: Later tonight: After
> months of careful refrigeration, Debian 2.0 is finally cool enough to
> release.
>
--
PGP EA5198D1-Zephaniah E. Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>-GPG E65A7801
Keys available at http://whitestar.soark.net/~warp/public_keys.
CCs of replies from mailing lists are encouraged.
pgpKrFDmaot5w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
