On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 08:12:20AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote: > > It was my understanding that this situation could be resolved in the same > > fashion that the man and info transitions were. By making the docs viewing > > programs aware of both the old and new locations, and back porting them > > into slink, the broken tools issue is resolved. > > AFAIK, it's just not possible to make Apache (and other web browsers) > make both /usr/doc and /usr/share/doc accessible at the one > http://localhost/doc URL.
So: is this the only *technical* reason for the proposed symlink farm? I will be very disappointed if the *technical* committee decides a change in each and every maintainer script in every package just because a single package is unable to look for docs in two different directories. Thanks. -- "49fb244bfca0e2c2245bc9a87d0a879f" (a truly random sig)
