> Joeyh has *NOT* modified debhelper. This is a conscious decision,
> not slacking.
> He states that he will change it when policy has decided what the right thing
> is. Until then debhelper stands as is.
I know, I've been following the debate. What I am proposing is that
Joey should modify debhelper and that we should then recompile all
packages.
I personally think that a consistent potato is far more significant
than the upgrade/downgrade incongruities which will result. And if we
want, we can provide a package which will contain one of the
symlink-making scripts for those who need the partial upgrade
consistency.
Julian
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
