Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One comment, though (and I know this is not what you want, but it's
> a small change :-)).
Well, my major concern is that this not cause undue delays in
acceptance of the proposal. Also, you didn't really propose a change,
you listed an objection, and threw out some possible *ideas* for
fixing it. So I'll pick one:
> > Viewers - image viewers
Viewers - file viewers
And yes, that would make it an appropriate place for, say, xless,
which seems quite reasonable to me.
Now, if we can squeeze this in without disrupting the process, then I
will most definitely support this amendment or correction or whatever
it is. Maybe if we refer to this as a correction, rather than as an
amendment, we'll be able to slip it in under the same rules that will
(I hope) allow me to correct my typos. :-)
--
Chris Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] | I have a truly elegant proof of the
or [EMAIL PROTECTED] | above, but it is too long to fit into
http://www.dsp.net/xtifr | this .signature file.
