Your message dated Thu, 26 Nov 1998 14:25:42 -0500 (EST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#29955 closed has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Ian Jackson (administrator, Debian bugs database) Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Nov 1998 23:13:15 +0000 Received: (qmail 20643 invoked from network); 24 Nov 1998 22:49:17 -0000 Received: from shell.flinet.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 1998 22:49:17 -0000 Received: from bobspc ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [208.14.31.198]) by shell.flinet.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA08522; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 17:49:14 -0500 (EST) Received: by flinet.com via sendmail with stdio id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail3.2.0.101) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 11:07:42 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 11:07:42 -0500 (EST) From: Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: policy versions aren't parallel with packaging-manual Package: packaging-manual Version: 2.4.1.2 Severity: wishlist The most recent version of packaging-manual is 2.4.1.2, while the most recent version of debian-policy is 2.5.0.0. I believe there has been agreement on the policy list that these documents would maintain parallel version numbers. I have filed Wishlist Bug#2993 against lintian, proposing that lintian version numbers be parallel to the packaging and policy versions that it is programmed to check.