Your message dated Thu, 26 Nov 1998 14:25:42 -0500 (EST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#29955 closed
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Nov 1998 23:13:15 +0000
Received: (qmail 20643 invoked from network); 24 Nov 1998 22:49:17 -0000
Received: from shell.flinet.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 1998 22:49:17 -0000
Received: from bobspc ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [208.14.31.198])
        by shell.flinet.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA08522;
        Tue, 24 Nov 1998 17:49:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: by flinet.com
        via sendmail with stdio
        id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail3.2.0.101)
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 11:07:42 -0500 (EST) 
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 11:07:42 -0500 (EST)
From: Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: policy versions aren't parallel with packaging-manual

Package: packaging-manual
Version: 2.4.1.2 
Severity: wishlist

     The most recent version of packaging-manual is 2.4.1.2, while the
most recent version of debian-policy is 2.5.0.0.  I believe there has
been agreement on the policy list that these documents would maintain
parallel version numbers.  

     I have filed Wishlist Bug#2993 against lintian, proposing that
lintian version numbers be parallel to the packaging and policy
versions that it is programmed to check.

Reply via email to