Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [I do not think we are i dispute, but I have a reputation to > maintain ;-)]
Oh, ok. > Raul> Eh? I'm having trouble understanding "how we do things now, if the > Raul> binary distribution becomes multiCD". > > I parsed your objection to having the copyrights on a certain > cd thus: Suppose the binary distribution no longer fots on one CD (I > think Slink would fit qualify). Now, base-files can be on one CD or > the other, depending on how things fit; and my understanding was that > this would violate your requirement that the copyright files be on > every CD. > > Yes? No. I didn't have a requirement that the copyright files be on every CD, I had a requirement that, for the case where they're not on the CD, they be on every system for which the CD be intended. Which isn't to say that's not a good idea. > I, in fact, even proposed that *all* cd images may have a > verbatim/main/copyrights.deb file so that we can say > > a) Every Debian machine has the copyrights > b) every Debian CD has the copyrights > c) Every debian ftp Archive contains the copyrights as well. > > This really should satisfy Marcus. I certainly have no objection to this. -- Raul
