Hi,
>>"Rob" == Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I was just using that as an example of an existing package that had
>> multiple
>> minuses in the version.
>>
>> I didn't make it up, I got it out of hamm:
>>
>> hamm/hamm/binary-all/doc/libc6-pre2.1-doc_2.0.93-980414-1.deb
Rob> Well, it's definitely broken.
Quite.
Rob> Totally unclear what the Debian revision is.
Umm, no.
Debian Revision: 1
Package Version: 2.0.93-980414
Package Name: libc6-pre2.1-doc
So the package appears to be legal, and have unambiguous
versions and name. Whether this was intended is unclear.
--
"Committees do harm merely by existing." Freeman Dyson
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
