> > foo-1.2.2 foo-1.2.2-1 > > foo-1.2.2-2 > > foo-1.2.3alpha foo-1.2.2.99.1-1 > > foo-1.2.2.99.1-2 > > foo-1.2.3beta foo-1.2.2.99.2-1 > > foo-1.2.2.99.2-2 > > foo-1.2.3 foo-1.2.3-1
Argh. Typos. Should of course read: > > foo-1.2.2 foo_1.2.2-1 > > foo_1.2.2-2 > > foo-1.2.3alpha foo_1.2.2.99.1-1 > > foo_1.2.2.99.1-2 > > foo-1.2.3beta foo_1.2.2.99.2-1 > > foo_1.2.2.99.2-2 > > foo-1.2.3 foo_1.2.3-1 ... > There is some merit to including the full upstream version somewhere in the > number. > > Something along the lines of > > foo-1.2.2-1.2.3alpha-1 In which case, this comes out as > foo_1.2.2_1.2.3alpha-1 I presume ? which seems fair enough to me, if you like that sort of thing. Both examples could be included, and the maintainer could then choose. Cheers, Phil. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
