> > maintainance to a single person. Yes, there are several accounting issues > > that keep coming up, but those are for the individuals actually > > implimenting a multi-maintainer package to resolve between them. > > > > Personally, I find this dictatorial attitude about Policy as potentially > > more dangerous than no policy at all. > > Please read my message again more carefully. I only objected to the way > you treat policy. > > The reason for our policy is not part of _this_ discussion--it is > discussed on debian-policy in another thread. The only thing that counts > in this discussion is that it's *not* up to the maintainer to decide > whether he/she wants to follow policy or not.
This may be true, but you should probably figure some other way of saying it. Touchy-feely stuff does have it's place, and in my experience (and I'm sure yours also) statements like the above almost invariably get someone annoyed. Britton Kerin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
