Hi, >>"Rob" == Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I move for a clarification of the emacs policy to ensure that I do >> not have start files from packages I do not have access to. psgml >> and vm stand alone packages are not commonly available for all >> emacsen flavours, and hence do not insinuate themselves everywhere, >> and this should be the recommended behaviour. Rob> Assuming I understand you correctly, what about just putting the Rob> psgml and vm startup files in /etc/emacs20/site-start.d and Rob> /etc/emacs19/site-start.d? Then only those versions will see Rob> it. I'll have to check to see what I wrote in debian-emacs-policy Rob> about this, but is there any reason this wouldn't be OK? That is what I did. And I got a bug report about it; and hence I thought a clarification may save us all future bug reports ;-). It works just fine. At least, it has for me. As I said (and I should have clarified it), I think that putting a start file in a subset of /etc/<emacs>/site-start.d should be recommended iff the package is only supported on a subset of <emacs>. (I thinkI mean <emacs> and not <flavour>). >> emacs19 does not seem to define debian-emacs-flavor. I haveg to do >> it manually in my .emacs. Rob> I think this was a bug that might be fixed now... __> emacs19 -q -nw (symbol-name debian-emacs-flavor) Symbol's value as variable is void: debian-emacs-flavor Sorry, not yet. manoj -- My other computer is also a Unix system. Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/> Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]