Hi,
>>"Britton" == Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Britton> What I like about the term limits idea is that they permit
Britton> authority to be rotated around regularly with no hard
Britton> feelings anywhere. I would feel bad voting Bruce out of
Britton> office after all the work he has done. Term limits make
Britton> change automatic, which is perhaps good.
Why is rotation of officers beneficial? I understand rotation
in crops and agriculture, but in my team at work, I'd make a horrible
document writer or a vms client design/code person. Why does
authority rotation make sense? espescially as authority is not an
disembodied entity passed around like a baton; it comes encumbered
with responsibility and needs time commitments.
>> This is not a yes or no on Ted Kennedy, but if he was doing that
>> bad of a job wouldn't he have been out of office a long time ago?
>> To buy
Britton> So I take it you are from Vladivodstock or some such place?
Huh?
Britton> I don't mean it to be unpleasant or ungrateful to Bruce, just
Britton> the opposite in fact. I don't like to think of any Debian
Britton> volunteer stepping down after being voted out, term limits
Britton> seem to me like a better idea for this reason and others.
Oh, bruce is tough. He can take it. Waste no tears on him
(sorry, bruce). And I don't think that the job of the president is
for the sensitive types anyway. Herding cats is not for the
thinskinned.
manoj
--
"The more you have, the more you have that needs fixing." Karl
Lehenbauer
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
