|"I want to check for opinions one more time before abandoning them. |"If we do that, disrespectful language will be allowed, and obscentity |"will be allowed. Is this really what people want?
That I find to be something I really don't want on mailinglists - leading questions. Of course people don't want disrespectful language and obscenity on mailing lists - unless of course that is the topic of such a mailinglist. The real question is: do we want rules or do we trust that everyone will behave as mature individuals. I'd like to opt for the latter, although I know that the occasional tiff (or is that with one 'f') will occur anyway, people being what they are. People feel strongly about a project like Debian and in my opinion, that is good for the project because it lessens the chance of inertia. Mutual respect should be earned and not enforced by rules. (O, btw, without meaning to be disrespectful to you, but how would you have liked it if I had started this with: "Do we really want a project leader who asks leading questions ?". Add more rhetoric like "and wants us to adopt his rules". Or even more rhetoric "adopt his fascist egocentric rules". It's not obscene. Disrespectful is also questionable - it would be 'allowed'. Yet it would radiate an atmosphere of hostility. Not a good thing. One of the reasons I do not like the "Do people really want..." kind of questions. I always counter with "how do you know people wouldn't want...".) >>> Ronald van Loon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) >>> <<< I hold your hand in mine, dear / I press it to my lips. I take a healthy bite from your dainty fingertips. My joy would be complete, dear, if you were only here, But still I keep your hand as a precious souvenir.
