Hi,
>>"Ronald" == Ronald van Loon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ronald> The real question is: do we want rules or do we trust that
Ronald> everyone will behave as mature individuals.
I think that past experience shows that peope can't be
expected to behave as mature individulas, at least not all people,
all of the time.
Ronald> I'd like to opt for the latter, although I know that the
Ronald> occasional tiff (or is that with one 'f') will occur anyway,
Ronald> people being what they are. People feel strongly about a
Ronald> project like Debian and in my opinion, that is good for the
Ronald> project because it lessens the chance of inertia.
Strong opinions do not necessitate crude and offensive
language ;-).
Ronald> Mutual respect should be earned and not enforced by rules.
Quite so. But even you say "should", not is.
I would not be opposed to a note in the charter of the mailing
lists that said repeated abusive or disruptive behaviour on the lists
could lead to corrective action, like digestifying a persons posts or
even expulsion (I think the list maintainer reserves the right to do
so anyway, right?)
manoj
--
"Perhaps I am flogging a straw herring in mid-stream, but in the
light of what is known about the ubiquity of security
vulnerabilities, it seems vastly too dangerous for university folks
to run with their heads in the sand." Peter G. Neumann, RISKS
moderator, about the Internet virus
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
