On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 11:22:53PM +0200, Guenter Geiger wrote: > On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: > > Is it possible to build a package of jack 0.100.0 that would satisfy > > dependancies of other pacakges in sarge that depend on jack 0.99.0 / > > libjack0.80.0? > Hi, > Seems that I am the last one on this list :) > The short answer: No > Longer explication: The change of the package name of jack has been > introduced because the jack ABI seems to have changed, so you have to > recompile all the packages against the new ABI if they should work. > In practice this depends on the calls that have been changed in libjack, > and the ones used by the different programs, so it might work.
So, in practice, we could lie to the package system and say that our libjack package built from jack 0.100.0 is libjack0.80.0 and only actually use applications that we know are ok with the new ABI? -- Eric Dantan Rzewnicki | Systems Administrator Technical Operations Division | Radio Free Asia 2025 M Street, NW | Washington, DC 20036 | 202-530-4900 CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Any unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
