I can sponsor the package with that lintian warning. as said before the package should be lintian clean as long as lintian is correct.
But overriding lintian is wrong, because it is still an issue. If it is ok for you I would prefer a package with a lintian warning. cheers, Gianfranco Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android From:"Ghislain Vaillant" <ghisv...@gmail.com> Date:Tue, 22 Sep, 2015 at 19:33 Subject:Bug#799768: RFS: ismrmrd/1.3.1-1 On 22/09/15 17:32, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > I would appreciate a lintian warning instead of a broken documentation > > > e.g. look at > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736360 > > > G. > Should the warning be overridden for the purpose or the review? Apart from that, I am ready to push a final version. I have to say that the lucene++ package you quoted really inspired from a packaging standpoint. Now the ismrmrd packaging feels really clean. Ghis
