Il 07/04/2013 22:00, Jakub Wilk ha scritto: > * Giulio Paci <giuliop...@gmail.com>, 2013-04-06, 04:37: >>>> http://lists.debian.org/20130216120158.ga3...@jwilk.net >>> Okay. So I see the following ways to go forward: >>> >>> B) Install the modules as public ones, but put them in a namespace starting >>> with underscore, say _sequitur_gp2. >>> >>> C1) Build the modules only for the default Python version and install them >>> to a private directory (/usr/lib/sequitur-gp2/). But then this will trigger >>> #702677, so either >>> implement a work-around for it, or wait until it's fixed, or switch back to >>> python-support... >>> >>> I leave to your discretion which option to choose. B is my preference, >>> although it didn't gain recognition on debian-python. >> >> Switched back to python-support and implemented C1. > > "python-dev (>= 2.6.6-9)" - why this version?
I took it from here: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ap-build_dependencies.html >>> There are some tests, it would be good to run them at build time. (Although >>> at least some of them seem to only touch code that doesn't even end up in >>> binary packages...) >> Enabled the relevant tests. > > Do you honour DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck? :) Now yes. :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5161de70.9040...@gmail.com
