On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Joseph R. Justice wrote:
>> wouldn't it be more reasonable to use 3.0.y as the next Debian stable >> release's kernel? >> >> I mean, sure, if many of the other major Linux distributions, the ones >> which can be considered as peers to Debian in terms of importance, >> collectively decide to use a different, later kernel version for their >> next stable release, it would make sense to use that kernel for >> Debian's next stable release of course, since it allows the effort of >> maintaining the kernel to be shared between distributions (at least to >> some extent). But, failing that, why not use the one that has the >> imprimatur of the existing defacto stable kernel maintainer? > > Please refer to this thread: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2011/12/msg00006.html > http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2012/01/msg00254.html > > If you have more questions about that, please ask the Debian Linux kernel > team. I read those threads. I see they're considering the points I'd raised (and others I hadn't, as well). Fair enough; can't ask for more than that. Thanks for the pointer! (I don't currently receive that list, d-kernel.) Joseph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAC58tq-__OY1aLBM6ys2DP=wkffbqjrntcmzc3pyzbjjerq...@mail.gmail.com
