On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Joseph R. Justice wrote: > wouldn't it be more reasonable to use 3.0.y as the next Debian stable > release's kernel? > > I mean, sure, if many of the other major Linux distributions, the ones > which can be considered as peers to Debian in terms of importance, > collectively decide to use a different, later kernel version for their > next stable release, it would make sense to use that kernel for > Debian's next stable release of course, since it allows the effort of > maintaining the kernel to be shared between distributions (at least to > some extent). But, failing that, why not use the one that has the > imprimatur of the existing defacto stable kernel maintainer?
Please refer to this thread: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2011/12/msg00006.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2012/01/msg00254.html If you have more questions about that, please ask the Debian Linux kernel team. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caktje6hdz_ak3ydh4xvghiephq6mipmmkhqwrbns4oqwrlx...@mail.gmail.com
