Andrea Bolognani <e...@kiyuko.org> writes: > This doesn’t completely disprove your point, though. Truth is, most DVCS > are no more different from one another than different imperative > programming languages are, and programmers constantly move from a > project using a certain language to another using a different language > without too much pain.
Yes, this. It's really just not that big of a deal. I like Git, and since I like Git I've learned a lot more about it, and therefore I know how to make it do interesting things for edge cases. That makes it easier for me to use it more and more on new projects. That's natural, and is just like with programming languages. But bzr is fine, as is Mercurial. I've used them both, and while I'm less comfortable in them, I'm sure that I could get the job done in either of them. I still use Subversion for some things, too (although with it merging is sufficiently painful that I really don't want to use it for a problem involving merges). -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vcrjwitp....@windlord.stanford.edu
