Hi Ben, thanks for your comments, I will look into it in the next few days.
Kind regards, Andreas Am Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:19:09 +1100 schrieb Ben Finney <ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au>: > Andreas Rütten <andreasruet...@gmx.de> writes: > > > this is a RFR (Request For Review) for my blogofile package. > > Thank you for working on this package, I am looking forward to its > addition to Debian. > > > - Since a few days the watch file included isn't working. Probably > > this is because of a change of the GitHub frontend on October 12th > > (see https://github.com/blog/958-the-code-tab). I informed Gunnar > > Wolf about this because he is the maintainer of githubredir.d.n. > > I don't understand the redirector. I also don't use Github. > > Here is a watchfile that worked for me to get the latest tag as a > tarball: > > # watch control file for uscan > version=3 > > opts=filenamemangle=s/.+\/tarball\/(.+)$/blogofile-$1\.tar\.gz/ \ > https://github.com/EnigmaCurry/blogofile/tags/ > /EnigmaCurry/blogofile/tarball/(.+) > > Someone else here may suggest a better configuration. Or maybe the > redirector will be fixed soon. > > > - There is no upstream changelog file. Lintian complains about it. > > - Is it right, that a missing upstream changelog file is not a > > strict must have and it will not preventing the package to be > > included into Debian? > > Correct. You should explicitly acknowledge the lack of a changelog by > adding a Lintian override for that warning. Explain why in a comment > to the override. > > > - Lintian complains about an extra-license-file. I included this > > file because the upstream LICENSE.txt contains beside the actual > > Expat (MIT) license some thoughts from the Author about his view on > > the license an Free Software in general. > > - Should it be included or removed from the package? > > Good question. Sadly the author has decided to use that file for some > non-license information. You could make a request to the upstream > developers to put that non-license information in a separate file. > > > - The package builds fine with debuild respectively dpkg-buildpacke > > but not with pbuilder or cowbuilder. That's sound for me that there > > are missing build dependencies but unfortunately I couldn't identify > > which one until now. > > The failures should tell you what the dependencies are. You might want > to discuss them on the Python forum for Debian. > > > - My resulting package contains a blogofile.egg-info directory. I'm > > not sure if it's needed for the runtime of blogofile or only during > > the build of the package. I ask on #debian-mentors and got that > > there is no clear answer to this. Sometimes a package need > > the .egg-info directory at runtime and sometimes not. > > - Do you know if it's needed or not? > > - Can somebody explain my how to identify this point? > > Ask that question on the Debian Python forum also. There is a standard > way to instruct the build system to install the package > Debian-friendly. > > > - Suggest or recommend a VCS, or explicitly git? > > Blogofile itself will greatly work without any Version Control > > System, but there are these two points: > > I think you should not favour any particular VCS. > > Since you say the package is useable without any VCS, there should be > none in the Depends field. The Recommends field should list them all > as alternatives (so it is satisfied by any one of them), and the > Suggests field should list all of them together. > > > - What do you think about shipping the example site as .zip file in > > the Debian package? > > Perhaps unpack it, and install it as a separate binary package (maybe > ‘blogofile-examples’). > > > - Should they go into a separate -data package? > > Not that name, that would imply that it's *necessary* data for the > package, which is not true. > > > Thank you for keep reading up to here. Again any review, comment, > > help or hints are really welcome. > > Thanks for your perseverence. > -- Andreas Rütten mailto : andreasruet...@gmx.de PGP, 6C9DFFB2, 8394 99DA 59BD BCE2 3FC8 3A9E 6633 0089 6C9D FFB2 --
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
