On 05/16/2011 01:07 AM, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm trying to create a new package of The Unarchiver.  

Hi, Matt

I am working on this new package as well. I asked the upstream author
Dag Ă…gren, <paracel...@gmail.com> about packaging it into Debian.

> When I build it
> in unstable, it generates the following warning and the resulting
> executables hang when run:
> 
>  /usr/bin/ld: warning: libobjc.so.2, needed by 
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6.1/../../../../lib/libgnustep-base.so, may 
> conflict with libobjc.so.3
> 
> If I build the package in testing, it links only against libobjc.so.2
> and the executables run successfully.  I shouldn't upload such a
> package to the archive though, right?
> 
> I think that this will be fixed by rebuilding gnustep-base against
> libobjc.so.3.  Should I add a versioned dependency against the fixed
> version of libgnustep-base-dev to ensure that the autobuilders use the
> right version?

I have filed a bug against this problem.

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627302

-- 
Best Regards,
Asias He


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dd5d0d0.3080...@gmail.com

Reply via email to