On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Matt Kraai <kr...@ftbfs.org> wrote: > I'm trying to create a new package of The Unarchiver.
Thanks! How are you building it? I took a look and gave up when I saw it has no makefiles, only an Xcode project and the GNUStep pbxbuild (that translates Xcode stuff to Makefiles) tool is not available in Debian yet. > When I build it in unstable, it generates the following warning > and the resulting executables hang when run: > > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libobjc.so.2, needed by > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6.1/../../../../lib/libgnustep-base.so, may > conflict with libobjc.so.3 > > If I build the package in testing, it links only against libobjc.so.2 > and the executables run successfully. I shouldn't upload such a > package to the archive though, right? > > I think that this will be fixed by rebuilding gnustep-base against > libobjc.so.3. Should I add a versioned dependency against the fixed > version of libgnustep-base-dev to ensure that the autobuilders use the > right version? gnustep-base should definitely be rebuilt against the new ObjC library. I think you could just wait until the rebuilt gnustep-base is available everywhere. I don't see any objc transition here: http://release.debian.org/transitions/ You might want to ask the maintainers if they had any plans for a transition and the release team for a binNMU and if they had noticed the need for a transition. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktikd0unjq0568p0qb9cxvclgimq...@mail.gmail.com
