On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Vincent Cheng <[email protected]> wrote:
> - package libenet1.2, and replace 0ad's build dependency on libenet-dev with > this new package I'd prefer to have only one version of enet in Debian, but I understand the reasoning here (protocol incompatibility). > - package libmozjs185, and remove the spidermonkey code that's currently in > the source tarball (this could be deferred until alpha 5 is released, since > according to Philip, 0 A.D. hasn't been ported to work with it yet; for now, > I guess we'll have to leave the spidermonkey code embedded in the source > tarball) Why can't you use the versions of SpiderMonkey already in the archive (1.9.1.18, 2.0)? > - determine what, if anything, needs to be removed from the source tarball > (the only thing I've removed so far is > /libraries/fcollada/src/FCollada/FColladaTest/Samples/Eagle.DAE) I'd suggest also removing any embedded code copies that aren't used by the Debian package. > As for the fonts, since they aren't used during the build or at runtime, > would it really be necessary to package them separately (is there any point > in having an unused package in Debian's repositories)? Removing them from > the source tarball would be a much faster alternative, unless upstream > decides to set up a build system to convert/render those fonts at build > time. I covered this in my earlier mail, was my guess about how they are used incorrect? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
