George Danchev writes: > Tony Houghton writes: > > On Sun, 16 May 2010 19:38:59 +0300 > > > > George Danchev <danc...@spnet.net> wrote: > > > Also, it seems to me that build-depending on xsltproc && docbook-xsl && > > > docbook-xml would not extremely trim the bits to be pulled as compared > > > to those pulled in the xmlto case, so don't expect big wins here ;-) > > > > AFAICT the above trio don't depend on the (la)tex packages that xmlto > > does, and they take a long time to install. > > Well, xmlto does not pull any latex packages AFAICS, and my cowbuilder > --login test says dice wrt build-dependencies drag: > > # apt-get install xmlto > Need to get 468kB/3592kB of archives. > After this operation, 20.6MB of additional disk space will be used. > Do you want to continue [Y/n]? n > > # apt-get install xsltproc docbook-xsl docbook-xml > Need to get 345kB/3469kB of archives. > After this operation, 20.1MB of additional disk space will be used. > Do you want to continue [Y/n]? n > > Both approaches would do, imho.
A slight correction: my main system's apt cache /var/cache/apt/archives/ wasn't perfectly clean, however the drag it is still 3592kB (xmlto) vs.3469kB (trio). -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201005162104.33236.danc...@spnet.net
