On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 06:38:38PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:34:03PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski a écrit : > > > > Because nobody on kfreebsd list was interested, and I myself is not > > interested in that architecture, I decided to limit the ARCHs by only > > those supported by fuse-utils. Respectively, I amended the > > Architecture: line in the debian/control of my package. Then, my > > sponsor uploaded it to unstable. However, because there had been > > already a version of my package in testing (sucessfully built on > > kfreebsd-*) [as I wrote, it got there because originally my package > > did not have a dependency on fuse-utils, that was, strictly speaking, > > a bug on linux that I recently attempted to correct], I suspect that > > this upload would not be enough to let the new version of the package > > propagate into testing. Please correct me if I am wrong. If not, > > please let me know what to do in this situation. > > Dear Stanislav, > > you need to request the removal of the kfreebsd version in unstable. > > http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
Thank you Charles, this wiki page was quite informative. I will request a removal. -- Stanislav -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100414211223.ga24...@kaiba.homelan
