On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:05:37PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:16:58PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: > > One of my packages, fuse-convmvfs (uploaded by a sponsor), cannot > > migrate to testing. The migration is blocked by kfreebsd: > > > > * fuse-convmvfs/kfreebsd-amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: fuse-utils > > * fuse-convmvfs/kfreebsd-i386 unsatisfiable Depends: fuse-utils > > > > What is the recommended way of solving this? > > fuse-utils is not build on kfreebsd-(amd64|i386) since it's > Linux-specific, see #528537: > > | Please find below a patch to add GNU/kFreeBSD support to fuse. On this > | system, the kernel module and the utilities are provided in a separate > | source package called fuse4bsd. That's why the patch disable fuse-utils > | on non Linux systems. > > Given previous versions of fuse-convmvfs exist in testing, I guess the > package is meant to be usable on kfreebsd even without fuse-utils > available. That would mean fuse-utils is actually a recommend ?
The package builds on kfreebsd just fine, but I never tested if it really works there. Actually, before the last upload the package did not have any explicit dependency on fuse-utils, that is why it migrated to testing seamlessly in the past. That missing dependency was a bug on linux, because the operation of convmvfs depends on preloading the fuse kernel module (the initscript of fuse-utils does that) and on the avaliability of fusermount. > You might ask kfreebsd porters on debian-bsd list for details. I am CC-ing this to debian-...@lists.debian.org. -- Stanislav -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100327131918.gb30...@kaiba.homelan
