On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 10:50:15 +0800 Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> wrote: > Sounds like completely the wrong way around to me. Adobe's projects > are the upstream and poppler-data is just aggregating them into one > source package.
I don't think it's completely wrong, poppler people aggregate Adobe's one, but is it wrong? We can track poppler-data update easier than Adobe's one, many people care about poppler and poppler-data and cmap-adobe-* package maintainer choose poppler-data rather than cmap-adobe-* package. Anyway, I hope new poppler-data package would go into NEW. Then, think about transition. -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/iijmio-mail.jp http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
